Original Article

Effects of Mechanical, Chemical and Combination Methods on Halitosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.51196

  • Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour
  • Ehsan Iranmanesh

Received Date: 12.09.2020 Accepted Date: 12.08.2021 Meandros Med Dent J 2022;23(3):282-290

Objective:

Halitosis or bad breath is one a problem that can have a profound effect on the quality of life associated with health. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the treatments used to treat halitosis.

Materials and Methods:

This study involved a systematic review and meta-analysis. It was used in conjunction with treatment, management, therapy, and therapeutics for the first-call combination of bad breath, bad breath, halitosis, pseudohalitosis, halitophobia. Finally, these articles were removed according to the text and 37 articles remained.

Results:

The effect of chemical methods on the treatment of bad breath was significant; halitosis was reduced by 1.19 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.57 to 0.78]. Additionally, there was heterogeneity between studies (Q=11.32). Mechanically, despite the presence of heterogeneity between studies (Q=5.41), the p-value was not statistically significant (p=0.15), with the effect of the combined methods, bad breath was reduced to 1.18 (with a 95% CI, 1.68 to -0.51). Additionally, there is heterogeneity (Q=12.14).

Conclusion:

The results of this study show that chemical and compound methods are effective in reducing bad breath.

Keywords: Halitosis, bad breath, treatment, management

Introduction

Bad breath, also referred to as halitosis and oral malodor, is one of the grave problems that many people try to avoid. Under normal conditions, the human breath is odorless and has a distinctive odor called ‘human odor’ (1,2). Approximately, a quarter of the world population have halitosis, with the majority exhibiting this condition occasionally (3). Patients usually do not express the primary complaint; instead, the patients’ family members and relatives become aware of the condition (3,4).

Dental practitioners estimate that only 25% of the population has halitosis, and the remaining 75% only has a medical condition or halitophobia (5). Several treatment modalities have been suggested for the treatment of halitosis; however, there is no consensus yet on a standard protocol for this problem.

Although many studies have been undertaken on halitosis, no systematic review or meta analysis has been published on techniques to evaluate the halitosis and the treatment modalities of halitosis. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to review the treatment modalities of halitosis during the past 20 years.


Materials and Methods

Combinations of the words halitosis, bad breath, oral odor, pseudohalitosis, and halitophobia with the words treatment, management, therapy, and therapeutics were used for the initial search. The search in databases brought up 1175 records, which were transferred to the Mendeley software. Then, a search based on ‘author’, ‘year’, and ‘title’ revealed 441 repeated records. The approval for the this study was approved by ethical committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences (approval code: IR.KMU.REC.1397.472.).

Statistical Analysis

At the end of this stage, 737 records remained after the elimination of 441 repeated records. Finally, 37 articles (Table 1), were evaluated (Figure 1).


Results

The effect of chemical techniques on halitosis was statistically significant; i.e., halitosis decreased by 1.19% [at 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.78-1.57]. Also, there was a heterogeneity between the studies (Q=11.325) (Table 2).

Despite the heterogeneity between the studies (Q=5.41), the p-value did not indicate statistical significance (p=0.15) (Table 2).

The effects of combined techniques on the elimination of halitosis were significant; i.e., halitosis decreased by 1.18% (at a 95% CI: -0.51 to -1.68). In addition, there was heterogeneity between the studies (Q=12.142) (Table 3).

All work included initial search of the articles, selection of them, record and interpretation of the articles and meta-analysis was done by two authors of the article.


Discussion

The results showed that the pharmaceutical techniques are useful in this respect; however, mechanical techniques are useful, too. Also, a combination of chemical and pharmaceutical techniques was found to be effective.

Akkaoui and Enhibi (6) and Buunk-Werkhoven et al. (7) reported the results only based on questionnaires, with no tools for measuring the severity of halitosis, including halitometers and volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) analyses; therefore, they were eliminated. These reports are studies that have a very small sample size (1 to 6) with a specific medical condition or specific manifestations of a medical condition (8-10). These studies are suitable for introducing new diseases but cannot be generalized due to their very small sample size. Therefore, they are not included in systematic reviews. For example, Lopes et al. (9) evaluated the effect of photodynamic therapy with the use of methylene on the oral surfaces in five 14-16 year-old subjects.

Another study whose abstract was available was carried out by Yaegaki and Sanada (11) in 1992 on the effect of olive oil and essential oils on decreasing halitosis in comparison with repeated rinsing of the oral cavity. The researchers concluded that the use of these oils could decrease halitosisby 65% (11).

A study by Rassameemasmaung et al. (12) showed that the use of a herbal extract of G. mangostana might be useful as an adjunct in the treatment of halitosis.

An evaluation of the year of publication showed that 18 studies were published from 2015 on, and 19 articles were published from 2015 to 2018. Of all the studies published after 2015, almost half (nine studies, 24.3% of all the studies) were published in 2016, indicating that the discrepancies in the results of studies on the treatment of halitosis have attracted the attention of researches more than ever.

A study by Porter and Scully (13) showed that the use of mechanical techniques, such as cleaning the surface of the tongue, brushing, use of dental floss, and periodontal treatments, could control the dental plaque and decrease halitosis.

In a study by Chen and Jin (14) 251 articles were included. These researchers showed that the mechanical cleaning of the tongue surface (brushing and scrubbing) significantly decreased halitosis (a decrease in VSC and Winkel tongue coating index, and an improvement in the periodontal status) in the case group. However, there was no significant difference between the case and control groups.

Several studies have shown a relationship between halitosis and periodontitis (15-17). At present, the majority of researchers believe that the two factors above affect each other (18).

Several studies have shown that chlorhexidine (CHX), essential oils, triclosan, cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), chlorine dioxide, zinc salts, benzalkonium chloride, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes are successful when they are combined with mechanical techniques (19,20).

Studies by Thrane et al. (21), and Thaweboon and Thaweboon (22) showed that mouthwashes such as CHX, CPC, triclosan, essential oils, quaternary ammonium compounds, benzalkonium chloride, and hydrogen peroxide mouthwashes are effective in decreasing halitosis.

CHX has been considered the gold standard for the treatment of halitosis. CHX, in combination with CPC, decreased VSC levels to a great extent and decreased the counts of both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in three hours. However, patients might not be interested in using CHX for a long time, because it has an unpleasant taste and stains the teeth reversibly (23).

These research works have shown that brushing the tongue with toothpaste could reduce the levels of VSCs for at least 1 h, and this was more effective than only brushing the teeth (24,25).


Conclusion

The results of the present study showed that the chemical and combined techniques are effective in decreasing halitosis.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Vice Deputy of Research at Kerman University of Medical Sciences for their financial support (Reg. No. 97000888). The Ethic approval Code is IR.KMU.REC.1397.472.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The approval for the this study was approved by ethical committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences (approval code: IR.KMU.REC.1397.472.).

Informed Consent: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: M.A.H., Design: M.A.H., Data Collection or Processing: E.I., Analysis or Interpretation: E.I., Literature Search: E.I., Writing: M.A.H.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: Vice Deputy of Research at Kerman University of Medical Sciences for their financial support (Reg. No. 97000888).


Images

  1. Nachnani S. The effects of oral rinses on halitosis. J Calif Dent Assoc 1997; 25: 145-50.
  2. Messadi DV. Oral and nonoral sources of halitosis. J Calif Dent Assoc 1997; 25: 127-31.
  3. Sanz M, Roldán S, Herrera D. Fundamentals of breath malodour. J Contemp Dent Pract 2001; 2: 1-17.
  4. Wilis CL, Gibson GR, Holt J, Allison C. Negative correlation between oral malodor and numbers and activities of sulphate-reducing bacteria in the human mouth. Arch Oral Biol 1999; 44: 665-70.
  5. Yaegaki K, Coil JM. Genuine halitosis, pseudo-halitosis, and halitophobia: classification, diagnosis, and treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000; 21: 880-6, 888-9.
  6. Akkaoui S, Ennibi OK. Use of traditional plants in management of halitosis in a moroccan population. J Intercult Ethnopharmacol 2017; 6: 267-73.
  7. Buunk-Werkhoven YA, Buls JG, Osinga E, Bruers JJ. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with halitosis by dental hygienists and dentists in the Netherlands. Int Dent J 2015; 65: 65-70.
  8. Silwood CJ , Grootveld MC, Lynch E. A multifactorial investigation of the ability of oral health care products (ohcps) to alleviate oral malodour. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28: 634-41.
  9. Lopes RG, de Santi MESO, Franco BE, Deana AM, Prates RA, França CM, et al. Photodynamic therapy as novel treatment for halitosis in adolescents: a case series study. J Lasers Med Sci 2014; 5: 146-52.
  10. Henker J, Schuster F, Nissler K. Successful treatment of gut-caused halitosis with a suspension of living non-pathogenic escherichia coli bacteria--a case report. Eur J Pediatr 2001; 160: 592-4.
  11. Yaegaki K, Sanada K. Effects of a two-phase oil-water mouthwash on halitosis. Clin Prev Dent 1992; 14: 5-9.
  12. Rassameemasmaung S, Sirikulsathean A, Amornchat C, Hirunrat K, Rojanapanthu P, Gritsanapan W. Effects of herbal mouthwash containing the pericarp extract of GarciniaMangostana L on halitosis, plaque and papillary bleeding index. J Int Acad Periodontol 2007; 9: 19-25.
  13. Porter SR, Scully C. Oral malodour (halitosis). BMJ 2006; 333: 632-5.
  14. Chen C, Jin YS. Effects of mechanical tongue cleaning on halitosis: A meta-analysis. TMR Integr Nurs 2018; 2: 69-75.
  15. Struch F, Schwahn C, Wallaschofski H, Grabe HJ, Völzke H, Lerch MM, et al. Self-reported halitosis and gastro-esophageal reflux disease in the general population. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 260-6.
  16. Liu XN, Shinada K, Chen XC, Zhang BX, Yaegaki K, Kawaguchi Y. Oral malodor-related parameters in the Chinese general population. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 31-6.
  17. Lee H, Kho HS, Chung JW, Chung SC, Kim YK. Volatile sulfur compounds produced by Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 421-6.
  18. Delanghe G, Ghyselen J, van Steenberghe D, Feenstra L. Multidisciplinary breath-odour clinic. Lancet 1997; 350: 187.
  19. Slot DE, De Geest S, van der Weijden FA, Quirynen M. Treatment of oral malodour. Medium-term efficacy of mechanical and/or chemical agents: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2015; 42: S303-16.
  20. Slots J. Low-cost periodontal therapy. Periodontol 2000 2012; 60: 110-37.
  21. Thrane PS, Young A, Jonski G, Rölla G. A new mouthrinse combining zinc and chlorhexidine in low concentrations provides superior efficacy against halitosis compared to existing formulations: A double-blind clinical study. J Clin Dent 2007; 18: 82-6.
  22. Thaweboon S, Thaweboon B. Effect of an essential oil-containing mouth rinse on VSC-producing bacteria on the tongue. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2011; 42: 456-62.
  23. Fedorowicz Z, Aljufairi H, Nasser M, Outhouse TL, Pedrazzi V. Mouthrinses for the treatment of halitosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008: CD006701.
  24. Seemann R, Kison A, Bizhang M, Zimmer S. Effectiveness of mechanical tongue cleaning on oral levels of volatile sulfur compounds. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 1263-7.
  25. Wilhelm D, Himmelmann A, Krause C, Wilhelm KP. Short term clinical efficacy of new meridol halitosis tooth & tongue gel in combination with a tongue cleaner to reduce oral malodor. J Clin Dent 2013; 24: 12-9.