Original Article

Clinical Features of Reactive Hyperplastic Lesions of Oral Cavity: A Retrospective Study of 460 Cases from Iran

10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.93265

  • Mahsa Kalantari Khandani
  • Fatemeh Bagheri
  • Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour
  • Mohammad Reza Zarei
  • Sepideh Eslamipanah

Received Date: 06.07.2021 Accepted Date: 20.09.2021 Meandros Med Dent J 2023;24(1):1-6

Objective:

Reactive hyperplastic lesions (RHLs) are common in the oral cavity due to the high frequency of stimulating and traumatic factors. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical manifestations of these lesions in an Iranian population.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective study was performed on 460 cases with the histopathologic diagnosis of RHLs during a 23-year period (1997-2020). The data were collected from the Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine Department of the Dentistry Faculty of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. The lesions were classified into the five groups including irritation fibroma (IF), pyogenic granuloma (PG), peripheral giant cell granuloma (PGCG), peripheral ossifying fibroma, and epulis fissuratum. Age, gender, location, histopathologic diagnosis, and the clinical manifestations of the lesions were collected and analyzed by chi-square test using SPSS software version 20.

Results:

Our findings showed that PG (32.8%) and IF (24.1%) were the most common lesions, while PGCG (10.9%) had the lowest frequency. All the lesions were more common in women and the most affected location was gingiva. Moreover, the mobility of adjacent teeth and loss of underlying bone were reported in 15% and 10.2% of the cases, respectively. A recurrance rate of 5.7% was noted after treatment.

Conclusion:

Most of the clinical aspects of RHLs were similar to the findings of the previous studies. The observed differences could be attributed to racial or geographical factors.

Keywords: Irritation fibroma, peripheral giant cell granuloma, peripheral ossifying fibroma, pyogenic granuloma, reactive lesions

Introduction

Reactive hyperplastic lesions (RHLs) of the oral cavity are known as a variety of lesions with local overgrowth. The majority of RHLs occur as the result of long-term stimulations with low intensity, including chronic chewing, food impaction, dental plaque and calculus, fractured teeth, overhanging dental restorations, and ill-fitting dentures. Furthermore, hormonal factors could predispose to some of these lesions, especially during adolescence, pregnancy and also hyperparathyroidism (1,2).

The RHLs are of non-neoplastic nature and indicate a chronic process of granulation tissue and scar formation in response to a local stimulation (3,4). A wide range of these lesions are observed in the oral cavity due to specific anatomical position and diverse functions continuously exposing the oral mucosa to chronic stimulants. Irritation fibroma (IF), pyogenic granuloma (PG), peripheral giant cell granuloma (PGCG), peripheral ossifying fibroma (POF), and epulis fissuratum (EF) are among the most common RHLs of the oral cavity (5-8).

Clinical diagnosis of RHLs might be challenging because of the similarity of these lesions to other oral pathosis including malignancies. On the other hand, the early diagnosis and treatment of RHLs could diminish the complications related to the growth and progression of the lesion (9-12).

Most of the studies on the RHLs of the oral cavity are limited to the reports of frequency, age, gender, and location distribution of these lesions, while few investigations assessed their clinical manifestations (13-17). Consequently, the present study aimed to evaluate the clinical features of RHLs in 460 patients referring to the Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine Department of the Dental School of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran during a period of 23 years and compare the findings with other investigations.


Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was carried out on the cases of RHLs biopsied between September 1997 and September 2020 in the Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine Department of Kerman School of Dentistry. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences with the code of 1397.278.

All the documents of the archive were assessed and the data of cases with the definitive diagnosis of an RHL in histopathology report were extracted and recorded. The data included age, gender, location, duration, clinical manifestations (e.g. size, color, surface, texture, and lateral profile of the lesion), accompanying symptoms (e.g. bleeding, mobility and dislocation of adjacent teeth, underlying bone loss, and pain), local irritating factors (e.g. denture, dental plaque and calculus, biting habits, medication usage), treatment and recurrance.

Cases with repeated biopsies, double registered cases and cases with the non-definitive diagnosis were excluded from the study. Microscopic slides of all samples were reevaluated by a second pathologist to confirm the histopathologic diagnosis.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed by chi-square test using SPSS software version 20. P<0.05 was considered significant for all tests.


Results

Out of 3,126 patients who referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, 460 cases (14.71%) were diagnosed as one of the RHLs on the basis of histopathologic evaluation. The frequency of RHLs was reported as 32.8% (n=151), 24.1% (n=111), 20.4% (n=94), 11.7% (n=54), and 10.9% (n=50) for PG, IF, EF, POF, and PGCG, respectively.

Gender, Age, and Anatomic Location

Among 460 RHLs, 315 cases (68.5%) were in women and 145 cases (31.5%) were in men (male to female ratio: 1:2.2). All lesions were more common in women compared to men. The mean age of patients was 40 years and the mean age of women and men was not significantly different (p=0.146). Moreover, the mean age of women and men did not have a significant difference for any of the lesions separately (p>0.05) (Table 1).

The most commonly affected regions were upper and lower gingiva both with a frequency of 22% (n=101) and vestibular mucosa with a prevalence of 15.7% (n=72) (Table 2).

Clinical Findings

The results demonstrated that the mean duration of lesions at the time of diagnosis was 1.39±2.55 years with a range of 0.2-20 years. Clinical and histopathologic diagnoses were consistent in 77.4% of the cases. The majority of lesions had a smooth surface (65.9%) with a darker red color compared to normal mucosa (43.3%). Furthermore, 46.1% of the lesions had a firm texture, 68.9% had a narrow base, and 73.7% had a size of smaller than 3 cm (Table 3).

The evaluation of accompanying symptoms revealed that 37.8% of lesions had bleeding, 15% led to tooth mobility, and 10.2% dislocated the adjacent tooth. Moreover, 10% and 18.5% of the lesions were accompanied by underlying bone loss and pain, respectively. The highest rates of bleeding, tooth mobility and underlying bone loss, dislocation of the adjacent teeth, and pain were reported in PG, PGCG, POF, and EF cases, respectively (Table 4).

We observed that 9.2% (n=29) of the women were pregnant at the time of lesion occurrence. The majority of pregnant cases (n=25) had PG, while two patients had POF and two were affected by PGCG and IF. In adittion, wearing denture, biting habits and accumulation of dental calculus were seen in 13.7%, 5.9% and 9.8% of patients, respectively. 22% of patients took medication.

Treatment and Recurrance

Most of the cases had been treated by excisional biopsy (91.8%) and incisional biopsy was performed only for 1.5% of the patients. The treatment technique was not recorded for 6.7% (n=31) of the cases. A total of 26 patients experienced recurrance with the frequencies of 11, 6, 2, and 1 cases of PG, IF, POF, PGCG, and EF, respectively.


Discussion

The RHLs are relatively common lesions in the oral cavity (18). Kerman is the largest province of Iran located in the southeast of the country with a population of over three million people. Kerman School of Dentistry is the main center in this province for referring patients with oral diseases.

In the present investigation, 460 cases (14.7%) out of 3126 evaluated cases had RHLs based on definitive diagnosis in the histopathologic report. The lesions were found to be more prevalent in women, compared to men (2.2 times higher), which is consistent with the results of most of the studies (2,4,5,13,16,17). The higher frequency of these lesions in female patients might be due to the role of hormones as a predisposing factor in the development of these lesions. Furthermore, the latter difference could be attributed to the fact that women pay more attention to oral hygiene and dental care.

The mean age of the patients was 40 years, which is close to the results of other investigations (9,14,19). In addition, in line with the previouse (9,19), the mean age of affected women and men was not significantly different.

Similar to all the previous studies, gingiva was the most common affected location (44.2%) (7-20). The high prevalence of these lesions in gingiva might be because of the chronic stimulations due to the accumulation of bacterial plaque and improper dental restorations. Moreover, some of these lesions e.g. POF and PGCG may originate from the periodontal ligament and gingival connective tissue or the periosteum (17). Gingiva being affected as the most prevalent site of RHLs supports the theory that these lesions are of similar nature but within different evolutionary stages. Daley et al. (20) suggested that the vascular texture of PG is gradually replaced with fibrotic tissue resulting in fibrous hyperplasia or IF. In the current investigation, the mean age of patients affected by IF was higher than in PG cases, which supports the mentioned theory. However, some other studies did not report such variation (19).

We found PG as the most prevalent RHL in this study with a frequency of 32.8%. Although many investigations revealed IF as the most prevalent RHL (3-5,12,17,19), some studies completed in Iran (13) and India (9) reported findings similar to the latter result of the present study. PG had a higher prevalence in gingiva and was 2.4 times more common in women than men, which is in line with the previous studies (1,2,7,13,14,19). Similar to the investigation conducted by Zarei et al. (13), the majority of PG cases were observed in the third decade of life.

IF was found as the second prevalent RHL after PG in the present study. Most of the cases were observed in the buccal mucous and during the fifth decade of life. Similar to previous studies, this lesion was more frequent among female subjects (2,4,5,15,19).

EF with the prevalence of 20.4% were the third common RHL in our study. Most cases were found in the vestibule and among women during the sixth and seventh decades. The latter findings are in line with the previous studies (13-19).

We found POF as the fourth common lesion in our study with a prevalence of 11.7%. similar to the literature, all cases of POF exclusively affected gingiva with a higher frequency in the mandible. Moreover, the majority of cases were female patients in their second and third decades of life (7, 13, 14, 18, 19).

PGCG with a prevalence of 10.9% was reported to have a lower frequency, in comparison with the other reactive lesions in this study. Consistent with the previous studies, all of PGCG cases located in gingiva and alveolar ridge mucosa (7-22). This lesion was more common in the lower gingiva and the prevalence was not significantly different between female and male patients. Previous studies (9, 13, 23) did not find any difference between the two genders in terms of PGCG prevalence. In some studies, this lesion was reported to be more common among men (5, 17). Most of the PGCG cases were in the fifth decade of life, which is in line with the literature (4, 5, 19).

Our results confirmed the previous investigations that PG and IF can affect any part of oral mucous, while POF exclusively affects the gingiva and PGCG is seen only in the gingiva and alveolar ridge. Eversole and Rovin (24) recommended that the presence of PGCG and POF in the gingiva support the fact that these lesions may histologically originate from the adjacent periodontal ligaments or periosteum.

In terms of the role of local stimulating factors in the generation of lesions, as could be expected, denture, biting habits, and dental plaque were the most common factors in EF, IF, and PG, respectively (21). In the literature, only Babu and Hallikeri (14) investigated the role of local stimulating factors. They reported the frequency of smoking habits to be higher in patients with PG, compared to other reactive lesions.

In the current study, 91.8% of the lesions were cured by excisional biopsy. In order to prevent recurrance, it is essential to perform a precise histopathologic evaluation and assure the lack of affected lesion base (17). Furthermore, dentists should attempt to minimize the controllable stimulating factors, such as faulty dental restorations, ill-fit dentures, and dental plaques to prevent recurrance. We found the highest rate of recurrancefor PG among the 26 cases of the present study. Babu and Hallikeri (14) reported a higher recurrance rate of 10.9%, compared to the present investigation. Similar to the current study, the mentioned authors revealed the highest recurrance rate for PG, POF, and PGCG.


Conclusion

Overall, the most and least prevalent RHLs in the present study were PG and PGCG, respectively. In addition, the lesions were more common among female patients, compared to male subjects. The most frequent site of lesions was the gingiva and recurrance was reported for 5.7% of the lesions with the highest rate found for PG.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences (1397.278).

Informed Consent: Informed consent is not required.

Peer-review: Externally and internally peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: M.K.K., M.A.H., M.R.Z., Design: M.K.K., M.A.H., M.R.Z., Data Collection or Processing: F.B., S.E., Analysis or Interpretation: F.B., S.E., Literature Search: M.K.K., Writing: M.K.K., S.E.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.


Images

  1. de Matos FR, Benevenuto TG, Nonaka CF, Pinto LP, de Souza LB. Retrospective analysis of the histopathologic features of 288 cases of reactional lesions in gingiva and alveolar ridge. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2014; 22: 505-10.
  2. Effiom OA, Adeyemo WL, Soyele OO. Focal reactive lesions of the gingiva: An analysis of 314 cases at a tertiary Health Institution in Nigeria. Niger Med J 2011; 52: 35-40.
  3. Awange DO, Wakoli KA, Onyango JF, Chindia ML, Dimba EO, Guthua SW. Reactive localized inflammatory hyperplasia of the oral mucosa. East Afr Med J 2009; 86: 79-82.
  4. Zhang W, Chen Y, An Z, Geng N, Bao D. Reactive gingival lesions: a retrospective study of 2,439 cases. Quintessence Int 2007; 38: 103-10.
  5. Buchner A, Shnaiderman-Shapiro A, Vered M. Relative frequency of localized reactive hyperplastic lesions of the gingiva: a retrospective study of 1675 cases from Israel. J Oral Pathol Med 2010; 39: 631-8.
  6. Sangle VA, Pooja V K, Holani A, Shah N, Chaudhary M, Khanapure S. Reactive hyperplastic lesions of the oral cavity: A retrospective survey study and literature review. Indian J Dent Res 2018; 29: 61-6.
  7. Kadeh H, Saravani SH, Tajik M. Reactive hyperplastic lesions of the oral cavity. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 27: 137-44.
  8. Naderi NJ, Eshghyar N, Esfehanian H. Reactive lesions of the oral cavity: A retrospective study on 2068 cases. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012; 9: 251-5.
  9. Kashyap B, Sridhar Reddy pP, Nalini P. Reactive lesions of oral cavity: A survey of 100 cases in Eluru, West Godavari district. Contemp Clin Dent 2012; 3: 294-7.
  10. Amirchaghmaghi M, Mohtasham N, Mosannen Mozafari P, Dalirsani, Z. Survey of reactive hyperplastic lesions of the oral cavity in Mashhad, Northeast Iran. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect 2011; 5: 128-31.
  11. Soyele OO, Ladeji AM, Adebiyi KE, Adesina OM, Aborisade AO, Olatunji AS, et al. Pattern of distribution of reactive localised hyperplasia of the oral cavity in patients at a tertiary health institution in Nigeria. Afr Health Sci 2019; 19: 1687-94.
  12. Dutra KL, Longo L, Grando LJ, Rivero ERC. Incidence of reactivehyperplasticlesions in the oral cavity: a 10 year retrospective study in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 85: 399-407.
  13. Zarei MR, Chamani G, Amanpoor S. Reactive hyperplasia of the oral cavity in Kerman province, Iran: A review of 172 cases. Br J of Oral and Maxillofac Surg 2007; 45: 288-92.
  14. Babu B, Hallikeri K. Reactive lesions of oral cavity: A retrospective study of 659 cases. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2017; 21: 258-63.
  15. Vidyanath S, Shameena PM, Johns DA, Shivashankar VY, Sudha S, Varma S. Reactive hyperplasic lesions of the oral cavity: A survey of 295 cases at a Tertiary Health Institution in Kerala. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2015; 19: 330-4.
  16. Maturana-Ramírez A, Adorno-Farías D, Reyes-Rojas M, Farías-Vergara M, Aitken-Saavedra J. A retrospective analysis of reactive hyperplastic lesions of the oral cavity: study of 1149 cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2011, Chile. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2015; 28: 103-7.
  17. Ala Aghbali A, Vosough Hosseini S, Harasi B, Janani M, Mahmoudi SM. Reactive hyperplasia of the oral cavity: a survey of 197 cases in Tabriz, northwest of Iran. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2010; 4: 87-9.
  18. Narwal A, Bala S. Osteopontin expression and clinicopathologic correlation of oralhyperplasticreactivelesions: An institutional 6-year retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2017; 21: 382-6.
  19. Reddy V, Saxena S, Saxena S, Reddy M. Reactive hyperplastic lesions of the oral cavity: A ten year observational study on North Indian Population. J Clin Exp Dent 2012; 4: 136-40.
  20. Daley TD, Wysocki GP, Wysocki PD, Wysocki DM. The major epulides: clinicopathologic correlations. J Can Dent Assoc 1990; 56: 627-30.
  21. Hunasgi S, Koneru A, Vanishree M, Manvikar V. Assessment of reactive gingival lesions of oral cavity: A histopathological study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2017; 21: 180.
  22. Torabi-Parizi M, Pooreslami H, Torabi-Parizi S, Kalantari M. A retrospective study of children and adolescents oral and maxillofacial lesions over a 20-year period in Kerman, Iran. J Oral Health Oral Epidemiol 2017; 6: 203-10.
  23. Anneroth G, Sigurdson A. Hyperplastic lesions of the gingiva and alveolar mucosa. A study of 175 cases. Acta Odontol Scand 1983; 41: 75-86.
  24. Eversole LR, Rovin S. Reactive lesions of the gingiva. J Oral Pathol 1972; 1: 30-8.